My question is: how on earth (rather India) did they measure the dimensions of erect Indian penis? When it's flaccid, yeah. It's clinical. But I wonder how the poor statistician (or whoever is doing the measurement) to arouse or ask the poor examinee to arouse himself so that s/he could take the necessary data? Just thinking of the possible scenario makes me laugh. Now, before we Nepalis gleefully start laughing at our less endowed neighbors, I think, following the same logic as that of the study, it is viable to say that Nepali penises probably are about the same as that of Indian ones. After all, Indians are genetically not too different than Nepalis. Ajay Sharma (fictitious name) can easily be an Indian as well as Nepali. Just some thoughts. I am sure I am going to be attacked left and right because of this posting.