so u don't mind the pictures, no. 4, so, why remove them? aren't u man enough to stand by ur convictions? don't you get it? he is getting more hits, more sajha users.. more revenue.. how can u make an arguement---> "even though Sajha is a personal website, the goal of the admin should always be to make it user friendly if it is to gain more and more members." then go on to validate the arguement----->"...all you cared about how many clicks your other site was getting...and possibly the revenue that it was generating." and then invalidate the same arguement----->"...but I think Sajha could do better without those pics." there is a logical disconnect just like many of u sexually repressed class have shown in this thread. No. 4 , i also see that u are on a mission to redefine the term "nude." i have seen more nudity and sexuality in mandirs than here. on the first line you clearly state, the admin should make sajha more user friendly to attract more and more user. but according to ur account most of us are honey ppl living in foreign land.. u implicate the pics are for honey ppl. so the admin is on the right track. he is making sajha (web site mostly visited by horny ppl) user friendly (by posting "nude" pics for horny ppl) catering to his prime users (horny ppl!!!). but u conclude sajha is better off without the pics. see ur arguement does not make any sense.. why should he remove the pics? i thought having a better seach engine and an accessible database were some of the features of a "user friendly" website. never knew bunch of pics of bikini clad made sajha less user friendly... well maybe they do to you.. you are trying to get a point accross... but it seems your thoughts are based on morality and values rather than sound reasoning.. u made an arguement it is not going along with the conclusion that u have drawn.. in short, learn to frame ur arguement and follow up on it accordingly..