We welcomed him when he spoke against the King. Yes, he was right about King's fate. He was also against the 12-point understanding between parties and the Maoists. Now, we learn from Prachanda and Baburam that India had a good role to make that happen. Why? I like what Mariorty says. I agree with him that rebels should not be allowed to join the government until they rest their arms. His role brings a balance since India controls parties, king, and Maoists. Indian's role is never clear and their intentions are unknown. He is the buffer zone against only Indian infuence in our country. India, parties, king, and Maoists are not trustworthy. At least they haven't proved that yet. So, I praise Mariarty's activities. I wish a good party had filled up his space. Because of all these nonsense, I don't get offended with his activites.