i mean there is nothing wrong in a political discussion if it is disciplined and everyone get a chance to speak. but i feel that everyone is eager to prove theirown point without analyzing and comparing their viewpoints with others. how can a view be right/wrong if it is not juxtgaposed with its rivalries? how can sth be "true" if there is no "false"? are nepali less analytical? why don't we let other voice to be heard. why me, me and me only? why not we?... sometimes i feel that "we don't deserve democracy"...its not in our culture to be democratic...i may sound rude but that's what i gathered from few nepali parties that i have attended so far. LooTe