Ok, IMI u have read america's history......we assume that, so what? Just because america has not included everything in text books can justify whatever you say. America is culturally degraded country if u try to look it from our concepts of good and bad. Just america does something and may be good economically does not mean, wat it does is right. Here we are trying to canvass a system where our history is taught and not that of ranas and shahs alone who looted our country for more than 300 years. If u are not interested to read, that is ur view but as earlier suggest by "many", we can divide the hostory course book on class basis, cultural history, economical history, history of literature..........I think u are trying to understand more than what we are discusiing here. We have not said that people should be kept starved and taught history...........I think u are not so fool to understand this point which should get priority.........U claim that there are enough books in markets........I challenge u go and search how many books u get regarding labour revolutions and history of trade union and contributions by chamar, mushhar(i hope that u have heard this caste.) just beacuse they are not significant to study shows that dumb mentality and interests in superficial knowledge. If u have to understand the market forces and labour relations(just one example) u have to see contributions of all..........which we lack.