Gyane listened to Chulashi giri who did not even know how Nepali soil smells like for about 18-20 years, so I am lebeling Gyane an airhead, here. any problem?????? Now, I am giving you my explanation: what's wrong with some the most cunning royalist who smartly reject him to be called by royalist? why hesitation if he really wants a$$hole airhead Gyane. Even Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, just before entering the palace for an audience from the King (actually airhead Gyane) when the Janaandolan II was at its climex, claimed himself to be "royalist" publicly. Categoration is rather simple: who supports the continuation of the current state's feudal structure and its head (airhead) Gyane is royalist, who supports Maoists activies is maoists, who supports Girija's and NC's stance towards solving the crisis is Kangressi, and who supports ongoing peace process (which is the compromise between NC, UML, ..., Sadbhabana, Maoists, people) is SPAMmer. Some fall in one or more categories. I fall only in the last category, and I accept if anybody labels me as SPAMmer. some royalist do not simply understand that we share the feeling that we should try our best so that maoists will not go back to jungle again. If I sound like a maoist, no problem. I know where I am. My only disagreement with IMI is just in one point: He sees moaists as the threat to democracy (if he really believes in), which I don't think is possible in Nepal; I see the opposite, that is, the monarchy is the threat because of its past, its intention/nature and army/police structures. Jai Nepal