rudra prasad upadhya, I don't think you read what i wrote. China is growing like india is, but it doesn't have infrastructure. Villages in china are as rural as indian or more worse. We don't see that because our culture is closer to indians and we don't understand chinese. By saying "As China is starting to capitalize, there has been a huge disparity of cash distribution in China". I didn't mean the communism that was there was before was good. Becasue the infrastructure there is not good, the government policy is not good, people are suffering in china. But we don't see that, we only see what's in media (that only shows the big cities). The other parts of china is totally censored. One of my chinese friends said that in places in china, there isn't even enough water to take shower, no food to eat, so they are even ready to come to city and work as slaves, without taking any money. Atleast they can take shower, atleast they can have food to eat. Where as US is different, it has very good policy for their own people. Most of all, people have right to speak and demand. "USA also has a pretty big disparity in term of cash distribution, but you cannot deny that America is an economic powerhouse". USA might have cash diaprity, but it isn't as big as third world countries, that's why it's economic powerhouse. I am not denying that fact, I am only saying that US's foreign policy is not good. So to build infrastruture in nepal, there has to be good policies, like minimum wage, benefits, etc. When people start earning money they themselves can invest little amt, if not much, to develop on their own. When people are too poor, there is always bound to be problemos. Nobody mentioned about "giving-back thing" that US does for the under-avg earners in form of benefits....is that also communism? why do people scream when i talk abt giving back? i didn't say give back all and share....And let me repeat again, if US stops giving benefits, the domestic terrorism in US will rise.