i agree with him partly--the problem that he pointed out. BUT i don't believe in the way he sees to approach this problem for a firm solution, but that's my personal view only and he has his own. he has full right to speak his mind, he is entitled to express his views. why go for banning and stuffs? people who want to debate will put forward their views and who don't can ignore the post, simple ain't it? How can a view be right, favorable, logical and legal if there are no wrong, unfavorable, illogical and illegal views to compare with? no offence Loote