I believe in Indian people but not the Indian congress and communist government. A reader on Blogdai said, "Whenever the Indian embassy here wants it can bring down ten thousand paid-people on the streets for protests". He gave the link: http://www.peoplesreview.com.np/2005/030305/detail/on1.html The link says: Nepal-India relations! BY PR PRADHAN Nepal-India relations have been festooned with many adjectives, such as, "very, very cordial", "historical", "age old" "brotherly" by most of the prominent political leaders from both the countries and even "special" by a few India-friendly people. Whatever the adjectives they may give, the fact is that the relations between the two countries exist very unfriendly.Indians have always tried to impose its hegemony upon Nepal and they always play foul games with her tiny neighbour. India has been spending a huge amount of money in Nepal just to create trouble here and whenever the Indian embassy here wants it can bring down ten thousand paid-people on the streets for protests, former prime minister Marichman Singh revealed recently. No wonder, India is the mother of the terrorist-declared Maoists with the top brass of the insurgents hiding in India and Indians have been supplying arms to them. At present, a group of Indians, known to be the instrument of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), India's foreign intelligence agency, is spreading propaganda against Nepalese establishment and is attempting to demoralize the national security force while boosting the morale of the terrorist declared Maoists in the name of what they call "democracy". Clearly, democracy is not suspended here, nor the political parties have been banned. In spite of that, Indians, along with her colonial-time boss, are making hue and cry about democracy here while forgetting what is happening in Bhutan, India's faithful and the most dictatorial regime in the globe. No matter, Nepalese people have understood the Indian intention very clearly and now identifying who are the India-paid people/political leaders here. Indian media cry We all know that the media of the largest democracy in the world is under the control of the South Block. The Indian intention is also reflected from what the media there say as the mouthpiece of the South Block. The media is also spreading false propaganda against Nepal with the intention of hitting the Nepalese tourism sector, the country's largest industry. Their intention is clear -- firstly, they announced suspension of military support and now they are trying to destabilize the economic sector so that Nepal would become a failed state. However, it seems, India has failed in her diplomacy as other friends, such as China, Pakistan, Russia, North Korea, among others, have come in with strong commitment to support Nepal. Indian dadagiri After the February 1 move by the King, some noted pro-Indian political leaders have escaped into India and are organizing demonstration rallies in New Delhi, the Indian capital. Nepal has not objected on the Indian intention of allowing them to protest but Indians should not forget that when an effigy of an Indian prime minister was burnt at Ratnapark, the Indians had protested on such activities. Isn't it an example of the Indian "dadagiri". The Indian attitude is clear. India is taking double standard. On one hand, it has announced the suspension of military aid to Nepal but on the other, it has not said whether this is her final decision. According to reports, India will deal with Nepal on case-to-case basis. If they talk about the "1965 secret agreement", India should provide security support whenever Nepal needs. In 1989, some pro-Indian publications here argued that India imposed blockade against Nepal only because Nepal imported arms from China. At a time when India is threatening Nepal to suspend military support, she is also afraid of losing the business on arms deal as Nepal may seek such support from other 'neighbouring' countries. It is possible that India may again impose blockade to protest Nepal looking elsewhere for military hardware, however, security experts believe that it is not 1989, and the world's situation has changed a lot. During that time the northern neighbour was not in a sound position to support Nepal, but now, the case is different. Finally, the Western blunder The British ambassador here said that it reached to the conclusion to suspend the military aid to Nepal only after consultations with India. The American envoy also dropped in at New Delhi while returning Nepal after his consultation trip to America. Those western envoys, either knowingly or unknowingly, are trying to see Nepal from the New Delhi's eyes forgetting the century-old Nepal-Britain relations as well as decades-old Nepal-USA relations, which were established years before the formation of India. Indeed, the West has committed a blunder by following India. One thing, all our foreign friends should not forget that Nepal is a sovereign country, which never experienced a colonial rule. The people of Nepal have the rights to choose what they like and not what others say. Quote, unquote Can India suspend military aid to Nepal? A friend replied: "When India has not been able to stop supplying arms to the terrorists here, will it lose business by suspending military deals to Nepal?"