Argument can be stong or weak .Its from which point of view you are looking at.Yes, No President doesn't gurantee balance of power but gaurantees the structure of politics same.When u do not know .how and what President should get?.how can you say that? well at least we know now parliament is more powerful than king or maoist. And it should be like that.No, i just want king to be there to avoid unnecessary powervaccum.I do not intend to worship him.To avoid more chaos in Nepalese politics in coming days it might be the best solution.If our leaders and vision and ability they can develop Nepal with or without king .The king doesnot need to be in the picture or should be involved in active politics. It is not as easy as you think to remove king.king is not as bad as you think .He is just as corrupted as any leaders in Nepal.don't compare money compare moral.