While it is important to keep our culture,history and heritage it is equally important to move with time. Now time demands king to move along with people.King cannot rule nepal as in Panchayat.No one man can rule .It is team effort while it is highly likely that there will be dicussion and disagreement on how todo things ,the out come of such dicussion would be better than one man deciding. Memyselfnnepal , were u born in 1989 ,u forget the history beyond that.i know what basis am i talking.But you are too stubborn to admit that what king did was incorrect. i can understand the dissatifcation felt by you and all others due to these corrupt SPAM leaders but there is no alternative to democracy.it is just not rhetrotic .I believe in it. Keeping in mind the contribution of shah kings to the history of Nepal ,my stance is ceremonial monarchy .Also the chaos that might come after the republician setup .Otherwise i would have advocated for full republic.Active monarchy is way out of question that too after such a big blunder by king.If he would have just worked actively keeping some good leaders of SPA then this day would not have came for him that his throne is in stake now and Maoist would not have been so powerful. if you say SPAM got 200k people by force and money why didn't king put atleast 50 k in the steet in support of him??