contd: So the recent HOR decision is correct. I am just against the way they put it forth simply because we have to learn how to make our law strong. There has to be a protocol, a due process that should be followed by people’s mandate such that the next government, regardless of how they come to power, can simply nullify it. Jasko sakti usko bhakti huna sadai ramro hundaina. When are we to start setting an example? People, via CA has to determine those major changes, not those corrupt and inept expired and just-there-because-we-have-no-other-choices politicians, who were, until they were stripped from their “kursi” and their “maanmani” - FINE with whatever was. Only and I insist ONLY the national referendum can decide what and how the nation would be run. Else, this vicious cycle of violence with small lemon break would never cease. And at last, you said Prachande and Babu Rame visionary. That is right. You could not have put it any better. Visionary, by definition, is someone who is capable to envision things which are generally not practical and are illusionary. They have a propensity see things perfectly irrespective of how unrealistic it is. Please not, I am not saying that all they have envisioned is imaginary, however their dream to create a red state where they will change the face of Nepal their way and their obduracy to insist that is the only way is being idealism at its best. God forbid if we see things differently. You say they are for multi party democracy? They can not even take minor criticism from an unarmed citizen. Remember Chilwal. Poor guy was just voicing for the very poor people who the sacrosanct Prachande and Baburame’s goons claims to be fighting for. Gyane’s autocracy jailed the voices against him; Maoists will simply put bullet on his/her head. And that, my friend, is also a FACT. Take it or leave it. IndisGuise. P.S: Perhaps on few things we just have to agree to disagree.