Posted by: Ramlakhan May 26, 2006
Secularism or Hindu Kingdom?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Re: Do you agree with parliament's decision to declare Nepal a secular state? « Reply #10 on: Today at 10:47:05 am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is no doubt in it and we must internalise that Birgunj is immediate reaction. Our society may not be able to digest new things but it will gradually accept change. We should be happy and be proud of what we have and what we own if we feel brotherhood and believe in it. KB Logged Jai Nepal Newbie Posts: 27 Re: Do you agree with parliament's decision to declare Nepal a secular state? « Reply #11 on: Today at 11:47:37 am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Muna Just for your information, three parts of Nepal is surrounded by India and not only birgunj. This movement is taking its pase and in few days time you are going to have a hard go. If byrning tyres and chanting slogans means democracy to you spammers, this is mean democracy to us also. You know the agenda of secular state came after Tamrat gave few crore Rs to SAPM goverment and Kofi Annan then congraluted POPE> This game is not as simple as you think. there are many NGO and INGO in nepal and the main motive is conversion. You see there are 250NGO in Karnali and look at the fate of people of karnali. Where does the money go. Hindu dharma was spread to allover asia. Pakistan (not then in existance), Bangladesh, Afganistan, Thailand, COmbodia, tibet (hinduism was there before BON), Srilanka. Where did so many hindu's go. Converted. Its ok if they are converted to BUDDHISM or JAIN because they are ultimately Om KAr Parivar and specialised branchas of VEDA'a. If to save your religion is crime I am am criminal so is George Bush, so is popre and so is his Holiness the dalai lama. Sakyamuni le hamro Raksha garun Logged Muna Newbie Posts: 6 Re: Do you agree with parliament's decision to declare Nepal a secular state? « Reply #12 on: Today at 12:53:50 pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOL....So you seem to have lots of fake bribary datas. Good for you. If you are so worried about conversion...do you seriously believe that Hinduism existed in Nepal from it's natives? Who flourished them in nepal...?. I dont need to mention that .Do I? Who are the pure Hindus of Nepal....Brahmans, chettries and their own suppressed counterparts( who looks and speak the same but are classed 'dalits'). Who do you think janjatis ( Newar from ktm, gurung magar, khas from west and the kiratis ( rai limbu) from east and others like thakali, tharu, tamangs)are-I m talking about the natives of nepal. Do you think they were hindus before the hindus started migrating from Northern India? What happened to their religion and culture? D o you believe they purely think they are hindus?.If they are ...where do they fall in your shameless castal heirarchy....Brahmin, kshyetriyas, sudra or the other one ? They never considered themselves falling under any of these ? So why are you so worried about Conversion when hinduism itself was a conversion on all the natives of nepal at some point of time. Logged Pages: [1] Print
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article