Come on guys, when Buddha was born, Lumbini was not under the Gorkha Kingdom anyway, therefore, Suddhodhan was one of the King of Hindusthan. Due to this fact, many Indian sites and claimed that Buddha was born in India. In this regard, I have no objection if anybody says Buddha was born in India. Of course, we can say that the Birthplace is now in Nepal, which is not debatable at all. Don't be fool with Indian claims-- when I was travelling frequently aboard in South-East Asia , and South America, many people told me Mt. Everest is in India. If you are good in observing the notebook that we buy in Kathmandu (of course made in India) has no Nepal in South Asia or world map. What can you do man? Whoever claims what facts remain facts. Therefore, I think in my opinion, we shouldn't waste our energy, or?