What is democracy? I do not think the Nepalese people are responsible to stand on what they term as democracy. Burning vehicles on the streets, destroying public assests, vandalizing property, shouting cheap medeocre slangs, and so on... shows how sensible Nepalese public are and what kind of democracy they are trying to achieve. Please learn what and how to follow a democratic principles! Just hooliganism does not show that Nepal achieved democracy infact it stepped into a blinded democracy. It is so unimaginable to learn the Nepal Government are freeing Maoists terrorists after the word 'terrorist' had been removed from their honorary title. What a shame? How could Nepal and Nepalese forget all those innocent lives lost? How could they support the ongoing movement when their affiliated political parties are themselves linked with Moaists terrorsits. No matter what Nepal government call them as... they still remain a terrorists so do Nepal Government be entiled as a terrorist organization... To gain peace... it is important to seek understanding but not full flegedly give Maoist members a state protocol. Nepal Govt. should not forget their stance on Terrorism and war on terrorism. I do not believe that King Gyanendra was that much of a dictator. I do not buy that piece of scrap. What has he done? Do you think that due to the security forces shooting of 15 or 21 people made him an absolute dictator? How about those Moaists leaders who have killed thousands of innocent lives. You, me and everyone are the witnessed to it. If they think they could buy their way through terror, they must be told they are wrong. By the way, please do not buy cheap gossip like King took 69 crore and others. Its just a stupidy to talk in such a manner. Royal palace expenditure also contributes to state expense, to maintain the head of state functionalities. Every state in the world has such expenditures. Nepalese should look at their leaders of how much they make too. Koirala and others have enough of state money schiffoned to their bank accounts. It is so rediculous to know that India habors all moaist military outfits. It is form their land that Nepal have been attacked so many times. Our land have been encroached by the Indian security forces and others. Why aren't there any cry of concern from the general masses? What has all the governments in Nepal done to stop such international violations? It is high time to think about all these rather than banging plates and spoons against the King or this affilators. It does not serve any purpose. It is a shame to see Indian leaders coming and influencing our political parties. Lets say in one simple word "Nepal is a part of India". I think this will serve many problems in Nepal. Since we depend on India to so large extent and governemnt cannot function as a sovereign state, then why not be a part of a greater India or be a protectorate like Bhutan, which Nepal has already been. People in Nepal should be nationalistic and have love for their country.. which not a inch of such enlightment exists. It is so sad to realize this. I suppose it has to do with our independent history that Nepal was always an independent state and we do not realize or value our indeoendent political nature. It is also a part of stupidy of the present government to detain the royalist ministers. I suppose the SPA government have stepped into the same environment as the people before them. Such actions does not serve any purpose towards peace or development but adds more conflict to already existing situation. Nepal had always been a submissive state. I do not think that state had acted againts the inspirations of its people. How could it do? When the state subsidizes fuel for its citizens or when citizens cry foul when they needed to pay timely tax? It is us who see these dramas. I do not blame Saddam Hussein of what he did in Iraq. I think Iraq needed him more than he needed Iraq, by looking at its history and present situation of the country.