lonely1 jee, I do not consider myself a good fit person for such person. I still have to complete my theoretical studies and I have to work at least 10 years in Nepal ( at least 5 of those should be relating to district level) before I can be a potential for such task. I would not agree that a person with PhD from Harvard, MIT or anyother top schools should be given such task right after their degree , they should have real qualification of knowing the Nepal in true sense. You are right, there may be some such intellectuals from academics, but that was purely my perception. And, that I got from my experience while I was a grad student in one of the Central Department in TU that supplies vice-chairman and members to NPC. They have good theoretical background and skills and capacity to work in a specific project, what they lack is the capacity to look at the problem in a broader perspective. Yes there may be some people in US or other countries from Nepal now working in academics and as professionals in various field. They can also be potential if they have worked enough in public sector while in Nepal. On "the ambassadors who were impartial" i concede my lack of research about the individuals, but I did not read anything about Shyamananda Suman in Quatar and Pushkar Man Singh Rajbhandari in Pakistan. But, you may be right all of those 12 may have been involved. My concern was 'who should be assigned now'?