Nepejee, I used to admire the forum. But the following line has changed me; ● Most of the active members are not comfortable with criticisms. So nobody criticizes nobody. How can members who want to be called "active for democracy" be not comfortable with crticisms? Healthy criticism is the norm of the democratic discussion. By trying to negate this norm, these "active members" have shown that they also have a "autocrat" inside them.