It's a known fact that Dixits, like many other beneficiaries, got heaps of accounted dough from Nepal's coffer. Some have gone on the build on that wealth, while others have literally blown it away. And there are few, who have just about maintained what they "received." Dixits, perhaps, have went on to build on whatever "significant" properties; movable or otherwise. There is no doubt that the palace’s expenses and properties need to be inspected and curbed to great extent. However, coming from Dixit, who themselves have been one of the larger beneficiaries, it just sounds like, Mr. goody-two-shoes. Agreed that they have built on what they have, and they have successful "business," but like any person with half a brain can understand - money DOES attract money. If you have a million bucks, it's relatively easier to make another. So the theory that they "built" on it, holds no water, if any. It can, if they are willing to pay cash value of "then" wealth in today's currency. I bet Mr. holier-than-thou have not given it a second thought. We can not track all the people who received such "fokat ko maal," but if we can draw the line - say-like, any person who received above so and so amount, "daan ma" has to return so and so much to national coffer, I wonder how many of the bourgeois "media" democrats would propagate "suuna ma ramailo guff." I say, let's do it simultaneously, benefactor and beneficiaries. Nepal is ready to open Pandoras Box, is Mr. Dixit and the likes listening? IndisGuise:)