Posted by: DemRepNepal April 24, 2006
FACT: Nepal without the King is -
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
India will never take Nepal. why ? it doesnot want another kashmir. Laaj lagdaina timiharu lai. Bir Nepali ko santati bhayera yesto Huti hara kura garna? sikkim ra Nepal eutai ho? wht is the population of nepal? what WAS the population of sikkim at that time? Did it have any armed forces? If combined Maoist and RNA will be more than 300,000 armed personnel which is twice as much as US army in IRAQ. are you fu(king kidding me? waht a lame excuse to save gyane's ass. Yes nepali politicians always take indians advice. because they were freedom-fighters in india during "Bharat Chodo" movement. they are very respected i n India- kisunji, BP, girija etc. However the future politicians will not be associated with India in any way other than diplomatic terms. Nepal will be better off withoiut king in the long run. Amonarchy will not survive for ever in a country where more than half of the people are dirt poor
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article