Posted by: samir28 April 22, 2006
Without King we can not save Nepal and sovereignty of Nepal.
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
I don't need this King but i need Rajsanstha. I want Ceremonial King as a symbol of national unity along with full loktantra, like Japan. If not Gyanendra and Paras, then maybe Hridayendra can be kept in that place, so that things can start afresh. If not Rajsanstha thyen I'll welcome the Indian army wholeheartedly because: 1) I don't want the autocratic regime of Shree 6 Prachanda, I have seen it in rural nepal. 2) SPAs don't have the ability to run a republican state. I know what the results of a Constituent Assembly is going to be, with the armed Maoists at one end and the SPAs at the other end. 3) SPAs negotiating with the Maoists to give up arms.. Well I have seen the 12 yr rule of the SPAs and know that they can't do it. 4) People talk about sikkimikaran. I feel that is what Pseudo Nationalism means. what the people want now is a good enough and econolically well off, peaceful life. I don't want the stories of how our country was great, how it fought with the British or till where its borders extended. I have had enough of that Bir Gorkhali crap. I want to live in the present and not the past. Sikkim is in a thousand times better state than Nepal anyways. State language is Nepali, Other Indians are not allowed to procure land there and i don't see any Sikkimese going to other parts of India for menial jobs or for that matter to Saudi Arabia or Iraq, to make ends meet. 5) 2 lakh people is a good number for a julus, but guiding that mass with an able Leadership into something productive is a totally different thing, and i don't feel any of the SPAs have that ability. I have seen enough of them. Call me chamcha or anything you want, but these are my honest feelings.I know that i am not the only one who has thiese feelings. Maybe there are no one in this forum, but nepal is definitely larger than this forum.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article