Deal or no Deal Ball is in SPA's court. The dangerous political game is in overtime. General people are suffering day by day. SPA rejects king's offer. It is No Deal. Is that the final answer? International community India, US, EU, UN want SPA to work out a deal soon before people suffer more, and country goes spiral down in chaos. Civil war? Another Rwanda? Maoists control? International community are definitely worried about Nepal being a failed state. Does SPA have a solid game plan or is it just a bluff to get back to political game? Who created Maoists? They definitely came after 1990 revolution. King Birendra after 1990 did not interfere with the government and left the parliament alone. Why did the government faced Maoist violence and uprising? How many lives and how much people have to suffer before the king accepts SPA's demand so that the king may say, people it's a Deal, strip my control over one of the finest military RNA? Please pick one subject and limit your thought under 250 words due to limited time and webspace or simply say: Under the present circumstances Is it a DEAL or NO DEAL - http://www.chakrapath.com/dealornodeal.htm