Bir Bhadra, I am talking about the economic sanction of 1990 when Rajeev Gandhi was the prime miinister of India and Marich Man Singh in Nepal. What I all tried to say is that India is using the maoist to keep the situation of Nepal under their grip. They allow their land to be hideout for the maoists but when Nepal's government try to establish contact with the maoists with positive intention, then its their turn to provoke the maoists. Sher Bahadur's government was in talks with the maoists but India had to approve the military support for Nepal at the same time. When Nepal's government becomes strict on maoists...then the Indians loosen their control over the maoists. Nepal's maoist must realized that they have been just utilized. Look at Sri Lanka. Its Indians who promoted Tamil Tigers. Indian helicopters dropped guns and bags of food for Taliban fighters. Later, the same Rajeev Gandhi sent Indian troops to crush the Talibans. So, Nepal's maoist and parties have to keep India in distance. Indian support for Nepal's democracy movement is just an attempt to take the side of winning faction. Didn't Man Mohan Singh continue to send the Lethal Arms to Nepal although they said they wouldn't support King's government? When the issue of Bhutanese refugee comes, India always cuts off saying that its a matter between Nepal and Bhutan but for the first time, its West Bengal Government's truck that came fully loaded with the Bhutanese refugees and dumped in Nepal side. Bhutanese Nepali at the beginning had taken shelter in West Bengal and Indian had even given them some support too, but India later traded with Bhutanese government on something and Indians drove the Bhutanese Nepali towards Nepal.