Mr nano-head, i just wonder why you are trying to associate yourself at that bunch whom i am calling as a group of people who 'are in the guise' of some profession. you champion out to defend a bunch of morons who ridicule an uneducated 'peon' whence i had bashed 'आफूलाई पत्रकार ठान्नेहरु" (and not "पत्रकारहरु") and this time too you are sporting in the defense of those people who are spreading racial hatred in the name of 'freedom of expression'. i have no problem with journalism as a profession, in fact i admire it, but i do have problems with the way people like you are abusing the general sense of morality and privilege the profession enjoys. so you nano-head, i will never agree to what you believe it as the DUTY of a journalist to ridicule some innocent peons or resurrect cartoons like these after 3-4 months to incite racial hatred or even forcefully feed beef to hindus next time (see my posting above - understand it before you vomit your idiocy please). and i can see, in your understanding, this is what makes u a journalist- right? no wonder- this explains exactly who you are and my condemnation is indeed directed to bad apples like you. my understanding of immune-jounalism is UNOPINIONTED REPORTNG, and once you exceed that line and begin shedding your own opinions, you will have to be prone to criticisms- that is only democratic and that is what guarentees the freedom of expression of others too. Beyond that, if you commit acts which would be punishable to any ordinary citizen, no idiot should be immune simply because he works for a newspaper- and that is lawful and that is what guarentees the state of sound living in a civilized society. sorry, i have no intentions of wasting my resourceful time with dickeheads like you- it was just that you are trying to paint a different picture of mine- as your misunderstanding of the professionalism inspires you to do, as always.