Posted by: aardvarak February 2, 2006
silence of seven parties towards maoist activities
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
All I am saying is that parties should make it clear that they denounce violence. It means condemning each and every actions from maoist that they do not support. Their silence means there is a tacit understandings between them. I am against of any kind of behind the curtain illigitimate nexuses. We, the people, have every right to ask what is their stance on anything that involves us. Once in a while, to be a democrat you do not necessarily need to loathe the opposition every time. I think you need to understand that as a supporter of the movement (or even those who oppose the movement) I have every right to question their decisions if it does not align with the overall interest of the nation. Our leaders are very autocratic down at the core, we need to nudge them constantly so that they would never undermine the popular mandate behind them. sajha used to be filled with hate against maoist. People still hate maoist for their atrocities. I will have to think about supporting the movement if parties do not make their stance clear. And that means they have to condemn each and every time maoist do something nasty.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article