Confused, Pardon my saying so..but the rambling post you have up here only shows that you really are confued :-)! 1. You said that the leaders of the political parties only worked for themselves and that KG is working for the prosperity of Nepal: How? What has KG done in the last one year that had led to a situation where the Nepalese people have benefitted? Have the bridges that were blown up by Moists been built? Have roads been built? Has security improved enough in the villages where Nepalese are not forced to flee to India or Gulf or anywhere else for that matter? 2. You said that the parties labelled the Maoists "terrorists" please tell me, what term is KG using to desrcibe them? Read/listen to his statement made on Wednesday- he uses the word "terrorist" and claims that they are now reduced to "petty" crimes - I'm not sure what the word "petty" means in his very educated English, but I am damn sure that the word "petty" is not used when Police and Army personnel are being butchered, civilians are being killed and kidnapped and rape by maoists and Army is rampant. 3. You said, "So isn’t it wise to choose someone who at least doesn’t change his direction just for power" - what exactly did KG do on Feb 1 a year ago?..He hatched a coup to expel a democractically elected governement. I know there are many who will say that the government was corrupt and incompetent so he had a right to to do...well..what is happening now? There's equal if not more corruption. We have a ruling elite that is full of people who were caught smuggling red handed, a minister who served time in prison on charges of attempted murder; another who has no idea if he is Congress, Communist, Royalist (I doubt Prakash Koirala even knows what year it is!) and then last but by no means the least, a chairman who lived outisde Nepal for eons and came back to Nepal only to take the post of Chairman and earn even more money than he did when he was the P.M under the Panchayat.... So again, please explain to me exactly what good has this "father" KG as "head of the household" to use your words, done for his "children"?