Ashu, As any other definition of democracy, your too is not objective enough. People have their own perception of Law. For Tulsi Giri, current government is democratic as per your definition. He claims that he has not broken any laws. Opponents say that the govenment has gone against every fundamental norms of democracy. There is no end to this debate. For me and some others there is nothing to lose in accepting Tulsi's perception of law. We are enjoying Democracy. Someone please come up with an objective definition of democracy so that we can decide whether to label someone or something as democratic or not. our discussion would not be conclusive and no one would be convinced on anyone's intelligence.