Posted by: IndisGuise December 29, 2005
End of Monarchy perhaps..US Senator
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
contd... Like I said before too, by virtue of being born as a human, and a mind to think, rest assured, you can be certain that my blood is every bit as red as yours. I DO NOT believe anyone posses a moral, or any other right to rule by birth. I am adamant that I should be every bit "eligible" (Note: I did not say "capable," but hey, may be, may not be: who knows.) to lead the state as any of you, including Gyanendra. I want to live in a country where no one poses a birth right to anything, where no one is above the law and my liberty is protected just as any other citizen. I do not doubt the dreams that these so-called moral less corrupt to the bone leaders are propagating, but I do have a damn reservation about their real intentions, and the leaders themselves, so much so that I would rather wait and watch in the hope that we can finally see a reformed fresh political parties WITHOUT these old and corrupt farts, and with some creditable leaders. I am just sick and tired of these disgusting personalities talking democracy while they moved from "chappal" to Pajero in no time, whereas all they have given us is nostrum which inevitably failed to bring any good to our society and nation in general. Before I answer anyone about me being touted as "darbariya" and what not, let me make my stand clear on monarchy. I am fine with ritual monarchy as long as it is under the law, does not have power over ANY state mercenaries, bar their privately funded "sasthans" or whatever. Oh yeah, they better pay their taxes too and cut those god-damn millions they get. This has been my standing in the nutshell. Feel free to disagree with my notion, but I stand firm on my observation, knowingly fully that I am, if not more, as good a citizen, as good a Nepali, and as free thinker as ANY of the self-proclaimed democrats. I do not believe shouting loudest against monarchy gives one the right to be in the position to bark at others not concurring with him/her. And I definitely do not believe it makes them stand on the moral high ground. Look, opinions can be divided, understanding can be flawed, and we all can look at "a" picture and can be attracted by entirely separate reasons and also find flaws not agreeing with one another; in essence draw entirely differing depiction. Instead of acting like a hound dogs, ready to pounce and propagate things with "mirch-masala," why not use rationale and use our best judgment instead of maligning each other and branding people as this and that just because s/he did not sheep-walked with our perceptions. Phewwwwwwwwww!!!! ;) IndisGuise:)
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article