AX wrote "how about this analogy KC Royals won the series against Yankees that means KC is better than all the AL East, NO??? Yankess and ChiSox were tied during the reg season.... I sid and say i tnow, Yankees matches better with ChiSox. you like it or not that's the truth. Want me to throw the nos and stats??? " ---yeah the analogy... MAN!! looks like I have to teach you ABC of Baseball. Don't you even see the wins and loses before you say who the better team is?? and lemme me remind you how many games the Royals won the whole season "56 Games".. and the Chicago White Sox won 99 games which was more than your Yankees Win..which was 95. So, i m not just talkin about the post season bud, but i am talking about the whole Season. They won more games in the regular season and more games in the Post season.. so you figure it out who was the better team. And now, if you say winning so many games the whole season is also just a luck. Then I have nothing else to say to you. AX wrote "I was thinking you must have changed the bandwagon after they beat your team :p I know you can?t say RED SOX was better than Chisox coz they got SWEPT BY ChiSOX :) I know it doesn't feel comfortable to talk about the team after getting swept, NO?" --- I know it doesnt feel good to get swept.. but lose is a lose... so I don't say we are the best team.. but you lose and still say you are the best team. Wonder how that works???? And you already saying the team has no money and they are not going to do good.. don't count the chicken before they are hatched. So, let the 2006 season begin and u'll get your answer. You and Yankees.. all you see is the money.. and you think only money wins the championship... i wonder Boss was saying the same thing... poor guy nomatter how many new expensive player he gets... they end up losing. And i am for sure they will do the same thing next year (more money... less win: yankees motto)" I am talking like you here ... hehe" ... I still say Chicago was the best team... and Yankees was less than a 'Mediocre Team'.