I read your posting. Your argument does not hold water. If you have the guts, do take, rationally, and without being too emotional and prejudicially attached to your caste, the challenges thrown by Bihan. Your lecturing to Gwajyo is unnecessary. You said you believe in "survival of the fittest" and "live by swords and die by swords", I have nothing to more to say. Please do check yourself the "population" you referred in your posts and many things will come to light. Your saying Forget Magars and Tamangs is very dismissive of other groups and only shows the continuance of the perpetuated arrogance that has dominated the PN Shah?s Nepal. I think it is one thing to take pride in our history, culture, etc., but we should also exercise our "biwek" in analyzing the history and distinguish rights from wrongs. I humbly submit that being proud or taking pride (garva) is not the same as boasting or bragging unnecessarily without knowing the real thing. That is simply "ghamanda" and "ahankara". Anyway, I do not see any signification contribution the Shah Dynasty has made to the Nepalis as a whole in their long run of rule other than the construction of the Narayanhity Palace. If you know of any, let us hear it.