Posted by: RRahula October 7, 2005
Prithivi N.Shah.. an Imperialist?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
a.However truth is Nepal was not a unified geographic land before gorkha armies stretched their arms under PN'scommandership winning and embedding them in their own territory.Almost all the hisorians though tell us a complete artificially born events of Nepal being one before the creation of smaller states.That Nepal was one nation before it was many and this visionary commander visualizes one nation and succeds.The present monarch is a product of the ego-centric cruel ambitions of Prithivi Narayan.Hence Prithivi was an imperialist not a unifier. b.Nepal is unified.Prithivi succeds.While the Europeans and Americans finally realized the values of human freedom and dignity(Getting rid of monarchies and finally enlightning themselves)sons of Prithivi capitalized their might with the baseless ideology of incarnation thrust upon their soul. c.The dysfunctional royals experience the bitter side of power madness that results in some unbelievable roller-coaster in the family.Ranas enter. We enter the 21st century still venerating a power-freak and some still believe in history pages that inks artificial accounts.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article