Freaksjee, There is always load of nonsense in a forum like Sajha Kurakani. So the best advice would be - ignore them. *** *** *** PSC, All sensible slogans there. It's just a matter of priority for the occasion that has made most slogans directed to King's dictatorship and popular movement for democracy and peace in Nepal. Nevertheless, here are my quick personal remarks to the issues you brought up. >Protest against Indian intervention in internal affairs of Nepal. >Protesting against RAW to stay away from Nepal affairs. Certainly there are things we don't want India to meddle with, however fight for democracy is not the one. Fighting for democracy is not an 'internal affair' of any country in the world. It is an 'universal affair'. So I don't see India's refusal to support a dictator King in Nepal as an 'intervention'. As for RAW, where is it ? In Indian Embassy ? I don't think we can get hold of RAW or CIA, CIS for that matter, and call for kicking them out. It's a matter of impossibility and is true for every country in the world. >Protesting to block India to become Security Council member >as they have been most hostile never to all South Asian nations. Can not afford. Simply. Diplomacy and International Affairs 101. >Protest against Bhutan to return their refugees from Nepal. No problem. >Protest against Maoist by demanding them to show their real >commitment by lay down their weapons and join mainstream >political movement. Maoist to stop expoliting in the name of Cease Fire. 100% with you. And I am sure there are going to be placards and speeches on the issue. >Protest against all corrupt leaders to nationalize their properties. Again 100% with you. And I can share this with you proudly that the organizers have given expression to that by accepting popular demand that political leaders, no matter how senior he/she is, be given no opportunity to be a guest speaker at the rally. As for nationalizing the properties, the issue has become even more popular since voice for investigating rumor of 18 billion pounds is rising. >Protest against politically motivated students organization to not to >spoil the future of millions of student of Nepal. I am 500% with you on the essence of this demand. In fact, I have been mad with these freaking NSU, ANNFSU and other declared sister organizations of political parties for their politicking and corruption in the campuses throughout 12 years after 1990. It was absolutely irresponsible to bring party politics in the campuses after the fight for democracy was over (presumably) in 1990. NSU, ANNFSU should have been decommissioned or depoliticized after 1990, because the political role of these organizations was not required after 1990. But we know what happened. However, since October 2002 take over by the King, student Unions and organizations now have the same mission and role they had before 1990. When the movement ends with success to establish democracy in Nepal, political role and affiliation of the student organization should end with that. That's my position. >Protest against various international organizations, particularly >human right organizations, not to make developing countries >like Nepal a secure place to secure their jobs and dollars by >exaggerating the reports. At this time when the state and the rebel are abusing human rights in Nepal in unprecedented scale, I would welcome more activity of International Human right organizations. We don't have luxury of taking about possible mismanagement of these organizations at this point of time. Abuse of people should be the priority issue. >Protest against those NRN who instead of doing something for >Nepal just demanding more facilities and criticizing for the sake >of doing so Interestingly, I do have a similar but slightly more liberal view on this. I have been very vocal about related issue in various forums. Will share it some other time. Nepe