Anil jee- Thanks for your explanation on behalf of Anti monarq. In fact those questions and UKHAN was directed to him. Chor ko khutta kat bhane jasto bhayeko bhaye I am sorry hai!!! I have some comments on your views that you have prsented above: - Do you think King cancelled this trip just because he is scared of facing black flags while he is facing such protest rallies every day at Nepal? You guys probably don't even see him from 47th St. as no one are allowed to protest infront of UN building during GA time due to security reason. - Do you think a head of the state of a country will give surprise by cancelling one flight and covertly taking another flight to visit NY? Give me a break!!! Tapai le pani yesto joke garnu hudo rahechha!!! - If the US is willing to provide visas to HOS/HOG from North Korea, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine etc (those countries with whom the US is having very bitter relation due to their vital national inetrest) what made you believe that they have denied visa to Nepal King? What the Nepal situation have effect on vital national interest of US? Part of the member of entourage is still coming including FM Rameshnath Pande. I think you have failed to judge the degree and complexity of the problem back home for which absence of HOS for such a long period will have adverse implications. I personally appreciate the King's decision. - President Bush might not have time to meet with the King. I think more than 170 HOS/HOG are expected this year. If Bush try to meet all of them for about 30 minutes each, he needs 5100 minutes (85 hours; about 4 days and nights) for those meetings. Do you think Bush can spare so much of time for that purpose? If Bush could not give time then there is no surprise. Nepal does not fall under Bush's priority. - Tapai haru ko campaigning efforts le kam ta hoina propaganda chahi pakkai gareko chha hola, jun propaganda lai sojha sajha nepali le biswas garne nai bhaye. Tara yo kura bujhnus ki Bujhnele yo kasto propaganda ho bhanne kura bujhekai chha. Nabujhnelai yo kura gairo abasya chha!!! (I suggest you to send those money that you guys collected to Katrina victims or maoibadi Pidit back in Nepal; Mridula ko PANI chahi usaiko restuarant ma biki halchha) -If India act to safeguard her interest, why should Nepal compromise on own interest to safeguard India's interests? Do you want Girija, Makune or Prachanda to act like Chief Minister or you want them as HOG??? Obviously India wants Nepal to become in extreme case Sikkim or if not at least Bhutan. In the name of regional power, do you allow them to enjoy such privilege? My point is that they are too much interfaring in our internal affairs and there are risks that we might lose our soveringty if we give them too much leverage. It will be easy for them if we are dis-united to achieve their purpose. We have seen how bad was our state of national unity in last 13 years - Party Party bich fut; party bitrai fut; rashtriya sampati ko lut; bhrastachari ra taskar lai chut; maobadi samasya; ethic problem; limbuwan, khamuwan; madheshi samasya etc). That does not mean we need dicatorship for longer period; at least we should be able to tolerate for three years if it is heading towards right direction to national unity and soveringty. - malai pani yeuta ukhan yad ayo - "kukur ko puchhar barha barsa dhungro ma hale pani bango ko bangai". Bottomline - It is better to be independent under dictatorship rather than becoming protectorate of foreign country.