Typical. Like your "the republic way or the highway" friends, you spit programmed rhetoric but neither comprehend nor absorb the essence of what others say. You are quick to retort, but your rhetoric does not bear the slightest hint of rational, progressive thought. As expected, you appear to have nothing of substance to retort so immediately you jump to the conclusion that I am a supporter of Gyanendra. This is also not uncommon. People who don't listen as well as they talk tend to hide their own inadequacies by launching defensive bouts under the facade of offensive allegations. I said the best bet for a neta to represent your thought cogently would be the Maoist leadership based on the very parameters you set out in our own writing. In response you apply the following logic: "this guy seems not to be in agreement with the republican line so by default, he must be a supporter of Gyanendra." Think about the implications of this logic some more. You have "one answer from me right now" and I will only have one answer from you, ever!! And not surprisingly, this is the same answer you have for everyone, all the time: "go the republic way and everthing will miraculously fall into place." I don't think so friend. I have no interest in making this a pissing competition. You've made your point 9 times on this thread alone, and it's the same point over and over again. I believe I've made my point also. In case you have the urge to pick another point out of my previous message and go off on another tangent about republicanism, feel free to do so. But until you take the time to actually read and comprehend what others say, I will not pay you the courtesy of indulgence in your republican rant. Have a good night. : )