What kind of changes are we talking about in the first place? Are we talking about multiparty system? Are we talking about one party system? Are we talking about constituional monarchy or are we talking about dictatorship? There is no one who can tell this specific system is good or bad for Nepal. One can say such and such system is good for Nepal because history witnessed it fruitful in such and such country. OR, one can say certain system is bad for Nepal because it was proved disaster in certain country. Even the best political analyst cannot tell you which system is good for the future of Nepal. It is like driving a car. You buy the best, the safest car, drive it on the best road of the world and follow the rules carefully, and yet, you stumble into trouble. No one is God. No one can predict what could happen. Coming back to your original question: Do you think political change is solution for Nepal? I don't think so, because haven't we seen thousands of political changes in the country since the 1990? If you don't have the stable Government, you will have political changes. Too many political changes in short period is not good for the country, and Nepal is one of the best examples of that. All we needed was stability, and all we need is stability in the political scene. Now, the question is, how do we get stable government? Well, I don't know. I am not expert in that matter, but one thing I can tell is that, we lack true leader -- A strong leader who is willing to give his best to create that stability in the country. We definitely lack such leader. The matter of fact is there is no apparent politician who possesses such quality to be a leader. We cannot count on the politicians who became our leaders and failed miserably. They were given a chance and the chance had been wasted. We cannot count on the king and his son because they have darker image than Bagmati River. Therefore, until the day such strong leader emerges on the scene, we will be asking the same question -- What change do us good?