As i said earlier your ideas/thoughts are really impressive and are well articulated. When one makes hypothesis, he/she may have to question oneself of about possible/likely factors that are preventing hypothesis to sublime/transcendent into a fact (in other words, what are the forces that are preventing the Desh Bhakta and Saccha Loktantrabadi to form a decisive force and how long does it take to form such force if this is gone be materialized?). Similarly, what are the favorable factors that could potentially assist in the formation of such a force? Then only you will be able to generate such force. And I thing this gone take quite some time and for this you need to have a visionary leader. Civil society and professionals can not do such a gigantic task. There might be several factors but I just want to point out a single factor for a time being. One thing your have completely (?) ignored is the fourth force-International community primarily India, US, China and Britain as well as EU, which has significant impact not only in internal dynamics of Nepali politics but also on stability of Nepal as a state. The way these countries are showing their maneuver in recent times apparently indicates their questionable intensions? I almost completely agree with the content of the Moriarty (not necessarily with the Bloomfield) but not with the person. Content is relevant but the person is not. As a Nepali, I see it as an unfortunate event where representative of a foreign country is admonishing us that we may become country less individuals! India seems to play double or rather triple role and EU has different thing to share with us. Well it is understandable that all the countries may not and can not come with a single agenda but they themselves seem to divided over what is good and how that good is accomplished in Nepal. Briefly, their divided stand (and may be ill intensions) may be a significant factor that is preventing the Maha Yaga to take place and Amrit to come out from the Nepali dharti. Nut