Nepe ji, It baffles me to the point that it almost disgusts me. The bigoted rhetoric views of absolutely anyone will not be entertained by the masses. Why else would anyone hold the absolute dogmatic views about their self centered egoism to fulfill their personal desire so much so that one would even hesitate/refuse to bring their common sense to play? Not that I am voicing the exactness of the poll taken by some other cluster, but did you not threw a big hue and cry about overwhelming outcome not in proportion with your personal beliefs on the basis of one leading question? I must say that question was a leading one in nature, but does not it heed on you that the rule of the thumb applies on both ends. Not only are polls - time, status (condition), and motive (in this case) specific, but also, manipulative as you in your 'free time' have been vocal enough to superfluously deconstruct the outcome of Sharma & Sen's poll. Then be it C K Lal or Ashu, or Shangroula or so much or as bbc NEPAL or for that matter absolutely ANYONE; it does not matter. Each one speaks for them, as and what their 'common sense' allows them to see'. Now, that very common sense is hinged on their political leaning or not, is the question. Let us not play the name game here. Anybody and everybody, who throws in their credential in the line, by voicing a poll taken on a specific time with a certain, specific and more than likely, clogged genre of people (Naramro bhanya hoina, yeutai manastithi bahyeko bhaneko), do not reflect the voice of the people. The creditability of such sources that are audacious enough to claim anything on the basis of so called poll's result, are up for debate (on this specific matter), and it might do good for them if they would do some soul search. But maybe they wore a different lens while screening that precise subject. Oh...well! Why carp like a faulty harp? What does that poll reflect anyways? No I mean both the polls. Their time value, if any, is long gone; and do we even need to ponder on length whether or not those polls had any meaning? Seriously. Even at the very time when those polls were taken, it was entertained and placarded only by them whose egocentric beliefs were matched. 99.9 percent of people know what those polls meant. Now do not tell me to go and take on poll on this one ;). Hehe. Any fool would know that the number of people favoring republicanism is growing; simply because it had nowhere else to go but up. I mean, when one starts from negative/zero, there aren't many ways to go now, are there? I thought so too. :) I, for one, am open to such changes provided certain "pre-conditions" are met, understood and the environs are opportune. Not to mention that any such drastic change should by and large bring euthenics to the not only to some prominent 'juntas', but to each and everyone and effectively erases the incumbent haphazard engulfing our motherland. But I digress. What I wanted imply, recommend or screech, is: let us leave that 'specific' polls and understand as it is, whichever way it pleases oneself. Being a BHAI or DAI does not have to do anything to do with it in whatsoever capacity you might assume it does. Period. Let us not make it a detrimental antagonism to be one up. Euta kura ni... IndisGuise:)