Ashu, FYI, I had used your "FOCUSED" point in my writing only as a side information--- which had no relation with my full text except the actor-related-information. It is a shame for a self-styled professional-commentator (mostly negative to democrats!) like you to take just a side information and say, "I have long been amazed and amused by the way you use (numerical) evidence in public forum to advance a point of view". You still lack in capacity to generalize the things and have a intellectual perceptions upon others---which are mostly biased by your personal will. If you did not read my full text, please have a look on it once more. If I were full confident upon the truth of the news, I would have written in the main text than as a side note. It DOES NOT mean that all the information outside from or against with the Ashu's ideological beliefs are WRONG. In spite of occasional sourceless information, we believe (have to believe) in media and have to use for our analysis---simply because we are limited in our capabilities and resources to check and verify each and every truth by our own hands. And, You claim yourself as a brilliant product of Harvard Business School (It is not my original way of writing... I just borrowed from you!)--- not just as a tourist, I have little doubt upon your business skills from this writings "Truth be told, except for Dhakal's album producers, NO ONE will know the true sales volumes of his CDs, and Dhakal's producers are not likely to volunteer negative information about Dhakal's album sales". It means we DO NOT know real market supply and demand conditions of a marketable product. Sorry folk! I DO NOT think so, even though it is not my JOB. It is your JOB !!! Whether you believe or not, personal impressions upon a artist DO MATTER for his/her market demand. ---- OK