san jyu, originator le removal ko request and "originator and ana beeach ko resolution" pani thread ma rakhi diyeko bhaye nispachye hunthyo hoina ra?? kina bhane ORIGINATOR initiated it is SAJHA. and you admit that there was a DIFFERENCE. (MISDOING??? we may never know) MISUNDERSTANDING??? Forum's intent is to preserve discussion. Just because it was resolved between the parties does not mean that the public forum used for that discussion need to be removed. My opinion it was that discussion that caused the resolution. By removing the thread, Sajha in itself has nothing to gain unless it is related to either party. If it is an independent site then it should allow all the posting to remain as it is. Personally, sajha did lose its reputation as an INDEPENDENT DISCUSSION place. YOU HAVE A NOTE SAYING THAT The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. You also have a big DISCLAIMER. REMOVAL OF THE WHOLE THREAD IS VERY BIASED. Let it be resolved by READERS whether the matter is resolved or not. I am sure most of the reader were analysing the fact and asking for proof rather than making judgement. what you mean is RED CROSS organization will ask all the forum that held the discussion about the misappropriation of 9-11 fund to be removed and it was removed because the originator settled? there should be a right RESOLUTION. If ANA thinks/thought that the individual was WRONG then they should post their RESPONSE and LET IT BE. And the anonymous user should also be behind the accusation made in the public forum; right?? BY THE WAY READERS AND ANA MEMBERS SHOULD ASK FOR MORE TRANSPARENCY IN THE EXPENSE AND INCOME STATEMENT PROVIDED. ESPECIALLY ANA CONVENTION INCOME AND EXPENSES .. THE TREASURER'S REPORT IS LIKE AN CHEQUE BOOK ITEM NOT A BIT DETAILED. ------just my thout.... but what do i know??? i certainly do not know as much as San dai..