Sorry guys let me have my say again. ''And if you ask me, I'd rather have Nepal's independence under a dictator than become an Indian protectorate under democratic leaders. '' But I believe we can have Nepal's independence without becoming an Indian protectorate under democratic leaders if Monarchy remains a truly constitutional institution or give way to a republic state. The 21st century world order doesn't require the existence of a dictarorial monarchy to guarantee the existence of an indendent state. Please do not link the issue of Nepal's independence with the inevitability of an autocratic monarchy, just like any other staunch royalist, if you are not one of them.