Dedicated to HPJi..... :) Open corruption, lawlessness, favoritism, immorality in governing bodies made people to lose their faith on government and that helped Maoists to grow. In the beginning some leaders pointed out that the Maoists were originated by the present king. I remember one of the great leaders, pointing towards Nirmal Niwas, said: "I know where these Maoists are moved from". Another great leader of the same party directly said: "Maoists are moved from Nirmal Niwas". These two leaders collected a lot of clippings from the mass because we have developed such a way that we want to hear such words. Leaders are very clever, they know what we want to hear. However we now know that they were not moved by Nirmal Niwas because their first demand is to remove Monarchy. Leaders should be truthful. One can get light popularity from such baseless words but such popularity has very short lifetime. Moreover they give opposite effect in the long run. Such words created distance between them and the king and people considered them liar and lost their trust. Tell me if you don't trust a driver will you travel with him? Maoists got crepitated by such low popularity motivated voice of leaders. You still don't want to accuse them for raising maoists? With all these I believe that Maoists were being germinated and grown by political leaders. Hushpuppy Ji, if you have disagreement, I respect that too. You are not the only one who doesn't believe that the political leaders are guilty; those leaders, their family members and their close aids also don't believe so :). I don't give importance to the past because it has gone. That is the reason why, I suggested the leaders to back off. This is what I feel the demand of this moment. I want leading figures of the political parties to back off and give chance to new leaders. This thread was completely standing on present contest (except some background of the past) until you bound me to go to the past. These leaders are incompetent, I strongly believe this. I have given reasons for that. Do you believe that they are competent? If yes I will be happy to disagree with you. I am not comparing here Maoists, King and leaders. All of them have their own strength and weaknesses. Most of us are divided into three different groups, but I am not. I strongly feel that all Nepali (parties, maoists, royalists) should unite to build our damaged country. We all are responsible to damage her. Whatever label we put on, Maoists or democratic or royalist, we have grown up in the same tradition. We have to establish a nice tradition. I am asking leaders to start from their party. Remember I am not writing against the political parties. I am not writing against the multiparty system. I am not writing against the democracy. Instead I am one of the greatest admirers of the democracy, but meaningful democracy. I was writing these entire things in my upcoming postings but you interrupted me. From your post posters I would like to say we have many similarities than differences. I haven't written anything in the support of the king. I have my own views about him. In this very Sajha, I had posted a long article, when His Majesty first saked Mr. Deuba. I had suggested him to move backwards and give full flagged democracy (with army under PM) to the people. I know he is not reading Sajha and if he reads he wouldn't listen to anonymous person without any status. I have heard that Kings are the most egoest person of the world. They care a lot about the labesls :). Instead he moved forward. His movement is logical but he doesn't have any solution of the problem. He can not solve the problem. If someone can not solve the problem he is a part of the problem. I have many questions for His Majesty and Maoist leaders. I will put them on some other day. This thread is dedicated to leaders of the political parties. To have a right democratic system, effective democratic system, there should be democracy inside the parties. If a leader rules like a king inside the party, how can we expect democracy in the nation? I want a systematic democracy inside the parties. I am very open minded person. I don't stick with my belief because believes depends on the depth of the knowledge. Different people have different circumferences of the knowledge in different fields. I have admitted in my first posting that I have very limited knowledge in this field. If you have a bigger periphery of knowledge, please feel free to enlighten me, and make me to admire political leaders and follow them. contd..