I agree with Sense on some points but not on this one: "I wont blame maoist since they can go to any corners for their hunger of power...but how cud a so called one of the world's biggest democracy change its color and simply for thier own tagged 'terrorists'...the hidden fact is, a war suffering Nepal is always good for India. " Actually, I won't blame India. Like Darwin's theory of 'Survival of the Fittest,' countries have always in the past and present tried to make themselves more powerful each day to sustain the challenges posed by other countries. India is simply following it. If it sees, instability in Nepal as a boost to its power it will use every resource it has to make sure that happens. What matters is how we, Nepalese, concerned about our country and its existence, react to it. And it is quite obvious that our leaders simply are not concerned about out country at all. Maoists in Nepal, which came in existence due to the incompetence shown by the democratic leaders post 1990, intended to bring revolution that they thought might make Nepal a better place, have let themselves and people who believed in them down, firstly by accepting massive violence as their strategy, and now by joining hands with India. In their demands, they seemed to have policies that would change Nepal?s relationship with India for Nepal?s own good, unlike 1960 treaty. Now who takes these Maoists seriously? They are as corrupt, as opportunist, as the democratic leaders we have had in Nepal. So finally, what did all those civilians, military personnel, and Maoists cadres die for, ?NOTHING.? Or may be to make Nepal another Indian state.