>>>The king is nothing more than a human being who was lucky to be born in the royal family in Nepal where fortunately for him Two quick things Saroj-ji, 1) I can't believe it took a Sajhaity to figure out that King is a human being! 2) Have you heard this word anywhere: SARCASM? ------ I am not against supporters of king per se. I am against those who are against democracy. It just that those who oppose democracy AT THIS POINT mostly happened to be supporting the king. And, dear respected sir, if it's not a waste of your precious time (which of course you spend in Sajha making tens of postings a day!), I have one more "pathetic" question to ask: Are you going to answer my question in my previous post? I asked you if you were willing to give up your OWN right to freedom of speech and keep shut. Simple "Yes" or "No" will do; No Mahabharat required. Thank you very much sir, I appreciate your help in trying to remove the "veil of narrow mindedness" from me! If you answer this question, I would bother you anymore, so you can use your precious time addressing "non-pathetic" comments. Btw, sir, Khagendra Thapa is one hell of a fictional name you have in your "fictional scenario." That "fictional" person has written several articles supporting the king's move. If you haven't read his articles, some of which were even posted here, and even ridiculed by truly yours once, perhaps it is time to stop writing and start reading! ================== Sahil-ji wrote: " But more so that the condition of Nepal might deteriorate further under democracy." --> Sahil-ji, haven't we heard this EXCUSE to curb freedom too many times already? This "might" has turned into a big IF, especially seeing what Gyanucha and his cronies have done since Feb-1.