Saroj, relax! Having seen your posts in this thread and elsewhere, I think I know where you stand! Read your OWN post again. In the last para, you say, " The incidents of today throws uncertain doubts in the mind of democracy lovers about the feasibility and practicality of democracy in Nepal. It seems like it's only a matter of time till the Maoist insurgency claim the capital and throws Nepal into another 200 years of communist regime." Really, Mr. I-am-the-only-person-not-indoctrinated-by-Western-philosophy, why is it that every bad thing, even in your imagination, has to be because of democracy? I have a favor to ask: If you so strongly believe the needs of hunger and shelter should precede press freedom and right to speak, why don't you, a strong supporter of the King's move, keep SHUT while the King fulfills the primary needs of the people? I mean if you support the fact that supressing freedom is right at the moment, you should be fine even if YOUR freedom is supressed, right? Now the question is, irrespective of what the democrats say and do, can you give up your right to speak up by keeping quiet? It's a challenege, bro, face it! Let's start right in this forum. If you cannot give up your right to free speech, don't your actions contradict what your preaching so fervently?