Snurp, after you asked me for the solution, I'm glad I was able to show you that politics does not have an outright answer. It is good that you understand that now. Your fail to read my point and choose to wander around the periphery about HIV. My point is that multi party democracy has already been tried in Nepal, and it did not work. It would be stupid of you to keep on trying the same medicine again if you know it did not work before. In any case snurps I enjoyed conversing with you. I think we've reached a point where we agree to disagree, because I'm not a big fan of repeating. I'm just tired of hearing people repeat how there is autocracy in Nepal. I have no doubt about it. My take is that it's better than the multi party democracy in Nepal's perspective - knowing what kind of politicians are in Nepal. Instead of one headed snake you're supporting a Medusa. Instead of being concerned about the common people of Nepal, you're more concerned with your ego in fighting for the so called democratic ideals that you experience in the country you are. Those are commendable thoughts but think about it practically. How is your democratic ideals going to permeate the Nepali society? How is it going to benefit the common people? You're already said that right now you are working your ass off supporting yourself and your family. Yes you care about your family which is great. But Nepal is about the common people. You have to try to choose the best option for the common people if you are trying to do any good for your country. Make sure thousands of them don't go homeless or hungry or lose their lives while you enjoy mouthing off your ideals protected in a foreign land. With this I take leave from this thread. Snurp please feel free to put in some serious thoughts in replying and re-repeating your previous statements. This was real entertaining mate.