kisr, Though the comment is aimed at Sursab, I was wondering if you could elaborate on what you wrote "your nepal is ktm elite who have good connection with the darbariya or the politicians...so no matter who comes its no problem..." What is Nepal and where does it exist? One who denounces Maoists is not a Royalist, neither is he/she a Maoist who denounces Royalists. Questioning corrupt political leaders does not make one either Royalist or Maoists. The nation is above any 'isms' or "ists". The significance of all these 'isms' or 'ists' is to secure, defend, and expand national interests. India does not and should not worry about glorifying Nepal's interest. Whatever India does, does it for itself. We should be exploring more and more of those venues where neither us (Nepalis) nor them (Indians) have to compromise on national interests. This task is not easy, espcially when our nation is run almost all the time with India's blessings. We can't move. India is and will be our neighbor. So, we should learn how to live mutually with it (India) rather than complaining all the time about Indian policies. We are watching a game in Nepal. Quite a few good players are there, but experts, who don?t play, are plenty. We the viewers are among those experts. We like to complain. Complain all the time. Neither can we play, nor we want to. Although, we want the team we root for to win, we want someone particular to score the victory for us. Here ?us? means just us who root for our team. We care less for the game, the other team, and fairness of the game. If our team wins: the game is good, and we are happy. If our team loses: the game (including those who invented or ever said one or two good things about the game), fairness, opposing team (players and supporters), referees all suck. I wonder what do we want? And whom do we think would deliver what we want to us and for what?