Ashu Jee, Nice to hear that you are a journalist. I never knew that before your advertisement in this thread, simply because I have not seen your writings that are of interests to me, that are of interests to most of us and that are of prime interests to our nation. Neither Khagendra Sangraula is my relative nor I have met him physically as you did (or are doing), but I know him because he writes about my interests, he writes about our interests, he writes about our nation's interests, he writes against any autocrats either it be against Gyanendra or Prachanda or Girija or whoever else, he writes against the imperialism either it be against India, China or America. So he does not need any advertisements, he does not need any blessings of powers, to be popular among us. He is the journalist of people, awarded by the people. While the majority of journalists (I am not sure whether you fall in this group or not) are just the puppets of the establishments who shy to go outside of KTM valley, write to satisfy their bosses to receive some medals and rewards, Kaka shows his courage and commitments to write against the autocratic establishments, to write against any wrong-doers but writes in favor of general people including me. This is because he does not have any greediness either to be an appointed information minister or to be rewarded from any prizes. He visited many parts of Nepal even during very unfavorable circumstances and writes about the voices of general people. Congratulations to your hard-workings on Khagendra Sangraula to find his few weak points. I am very happy to see that you found three weak points in the course of 5 years. In the same vain with other Nepali writers, you also follow the same path, the path of "खुट्टा तान्ने प्रबृति" . I do not mean that Khagendra Sangraula's articles are 100% correct. He is also a man and has many limitations. He occasionally vomits his emotional feelings in his articles at the extreme level, which may not be good in general. I did not read his writings about "Rithik Roshan kanda" and "Royal Massacre" but I went through all his articles about "Beauty Contest". In my view point, there was nothing wrong to oppose such contest in the case of Nepal but his writings after the contest was somewhat absurd. I agree on this point. But I believe "few mistakes are always better than all mistakes". Another reason I like Kunsang Kaka is because of his Nepali writings. While you are showing your superiority by using difficult and rarely used English words, which majority of us do not understand, he writes in such a good Nepali words that we fully understand and enjoy from the beautiful language. I do not think that he is not good as you in English, but I categorize him as one of the dedicated person to upgrade and to strengthen Nepali Language. Neither I am a writer nor I am fluent in English Language. I have neither any political connections nor I am journalism major. If you want to write some healthy discussions, use simple and easily understandable English words or, even write in Nepali. I do not think that you do write in Nepali because you are a English crazy man. I am not going to argue with you. This is not my job and this post is not intended to do so. After seeing your post in another thread where you called others as "third graders" showing your smartness in English, I feel that to argue and to discuss with you is just a waste of time. I always believe in fruitful discussions that result good conclusions which are of interests to majority of us, if not all of us. Lastly, I appreciate your analysis about him. He needs such comments from so-called journalists like you to improve himself. Did you talk with him about all these when you met him? If YES, you are the great and if NO, I do not have any words suitable to designate you. ------ OK