Andrew bro, As you have made some stern defence about the moral obligations concerning sex in christianity, let me ask you a question. I have been following this homosexuality in christianity issue ever since a big row erupted between worlwide anglican communion after the consecration of first openly gay bishop Robinson in Newhampshire. (I am a moderate hindu though but had to work on this issue some time ago). Before that there was a similar row in England at church of Reading and the newly elect gay bishop Dr. Geffry was forced to resign. And it was feared that the anglican community was on the verge of split between evangelicals and moderate christians. Let me recall - some months ago, there was a meeting of worldwide anglican primates in Northern Ireland. And I had with me this two clergymen for and against the debate about allowing homosexual priests at church or not. And they were extremely rude to each other. One accusing the other of going against the god's teaching and the other accusing of attacking individual rights and hence against the god's teaching in itself. The bible seem to restrict same sex but that was written centuries ago. In the mean time, Christians are very liberal about conversion. They tend to convert any individual regardless of their past. But when it comes to homosexuality why does the majority of the christiandom can't accept them as fellow christians? Why do they retort and call them as satans abdominating the god? Why is christianity not as clear as other religion about sex and so many scandals relating sex surface out? Isn't this a hypocracy? Thats my question to you.