geeeeees,m every country on earth is communist compared to nepal, and thats that, i agree with big cock, rat5her than you girly men, i tell you what i am saying this is it, the king of nepal,. has killed, and read this MORE, thna teh maoists in nepal, it may be hard for someone as dumb and pathetic as yiou are to understand, i feel sorry for you being so pathetci that you do not understand that, i am telling you i prefer marxism to monarchy and prefer democratic society like we have in teh us to cimmunsuim, but i feel i must defend communism,. against monarchy to show how bad monarchy is, and if you want to start talking about worldwide, good point, the fact is that deffinately fidel castro may have jailed many dissidents but he deffinately has not jailed as many dissidents as say, teh king of nepal, i do not even have to leave talking about nepal, and ta that lets talk about stalin and mao, which is ridiculus, i mean to mention teh brutalest dictators, in leftist history to defed your king is crap, and it is still a loosing arguiment, look at The Belgfain King Leopold in teh Congo, do you know how many he killed, there, i tell you then, it was between 1890-1910, and teh nation of Congo fell in population purely by kingly greed, from 27million too 8 million, that is more than stalin, as under stalin, 3 million includinmg prisoners, died in gulags, and 10million in the ukrainains and Soviet famiens, plus 3million in otehr kills, both pretty crap, but condiering tahthe king of belgium, who would have been a pal, of nepal's king ruled a country of ionly 21 million, taht is crap, as teh Soviet;s rueld 130 million people, fopr longer, and beat the nazis, and rose tehri land, from intense, poverty, and abolsihed sharecropping, making russia so great that look at this, in electiosn today teh country where teh communist get most votes is Russia, with 40 per cent v Yeltsin in 1996, that is allot, i would be unhappy if they won, but it tells us sometjing every land in eastern europe which is a democarcy has elecetd former communists, since 1991, that is somethjing and every one, and ebveryone has progressed and some have even elected capiatalists tehn communists again, that is a massive fact, so teh worst socialist dictatotr in Europe was less bad than teh worst monarchist dictator, and taht is not including how the kaiser, and teh tsar caused world war one, which caused teh daeths purely over territory, in total of 17 million people, thats allmost as many peopel as live in nepal, and that war, caused teh spread of flu, which started in teh trenches and that caused anotehr 50million deaths, of which many were in Nepal, and India, spread there, by teh turmoil of war, by teh way the Ukrainain famine daeths and gulag deaths, awwell most of teh, were also caused by disease, sio it ios teh same, so lets look at asia, which was teh worst dictator there, well according to stats mao killed allot, yep allot, 25 million including the famines, and gulags, and executions, but in that period teh country increased in population, by double, at a faster rate in it's history, even with populationm control, condoms, and such, (pretty big ones for me) (little man, men, you would have smaller ones, together than me) who would teh comparison for asia, be, well there are two examples, teh ajapnese, emperor, and teh king of china, under the japanese, emperor 27 million peopel died in a space of onloy 15 years, even though tehy ruled hardly any of China, also teh emperor of china of the 1900s, saw 27 million peopel died in famine, in teh 1900s, considering the population of china in the 1900s was so much smaller, than taht uinder mao, this was far larger than even largarer estimates for thos who died in eth fanmiens, and gulags under mao, and in that era, 10 per cent of teh population of china were slaves, and the rrst effectivley were sharcroppers, so only alittle less than serfs, so all in all, nepal's maoists are better tahn teh king, and teh monarchies of teh 20th century were worse than the republics, of teh flu deaths well over 20million were in asia, so monarchy hjas been far worse for asia, than communism, you may like to believ otehrwise but that is the case, in truth what happned aroun dthe wordl in teh evil opf monarchy shopuld have an affect but peopel will iognore thsese, facts, teh act is monarchy killed more than communism, by ity's wars and conflicts, and in terms of massacres undoubtably teh ajapnese, massacres in wordl war two, were more numeroyus than teh massacre totals and executiosn by stalin and mao, put togetehr thaht is not including effects of war, or gulags, so in truth monarchists are worse than communists, communists had done bad too, but democarts record is better and halriousoly by teh way there is far more democracy in cuba than in monarchies liek saudi arabia, in cuba peopel run tehri own firms, and that is true, while saudi nepali servants are betaen, and otehr stoo, if you think monarchy is more democratic you are mad, but teh truth is otherwise, there is allmost more democracy under communism, than monarchy and taht is prooven