I don't understand some of the postings above. When I asked Sitara didi what was the husband's side, she wrote another woman was involved. Lemme post it word for word. Meera says, "Sitara sis, what is the reason for the guy filing for divorce?" Sitara says, "Meera, good question. Another woman is involved!" Then we see 20 different ppl wanting to know the other side of the story, how dumb is that! then someone goes above and says the guy's already a divorcee re, Sitara sis been saying again and again that he is a WIDOW, not a divorcee. There is a difference u know. For heaven's sake, its not the girl's fault, the guy probably is going through mid life crisis and fell for another chick. The girl should sue for every nick and penny that he has and then also ask for a part of his monthly income. Was this case in Nepal, the guy would marry another woman without even telling the first one. If the wife was rich and powerful, she would go to the police where the maximm penalty is to put the guy in jail for a month and he walks out scot free. If he files for divorce, she would lose her house, children and the society would instead scorn her. Sounds harsh eh, just saying it the way it is.