It's getting quite interesting... Hard to determine which one is propaganda, Govt's version or Prachandapanthi's version. Interestingly, why Mahara has to come up so quickly with the statment related to the news of expelled baburame. How can they prove? The burden of proof suddenly fell on the shoulders of prachandapantis more than on the Govt's shoulders. Because prachandapanthi came up so qucikly to deny the news releases by Rastriya Samachar Samiti. If they have brains (which we know they have rotten ones only), they rather have Baburame release his statement than that of Mahara. But by the way the things are moving in Nepal between Govt and Prachandapanthis.... we always have to keep on bugging our minds if there has always been close link between King Gyane and Prachandapanthis. (I like to now call Moists as Prachandapanthi as per the suggestion of UML). And what a coincidence, when Tulsi Giri asked not to give brand name "Maoists" thenafter UML decided to call "Prachandapanthi". What's going on???